Tuesday, April 22, 2025

How discrimination works, and what we can do to make it stop.

 


Discrimination Isn’t Just a Slur or a Policy. It’s a System. And You’re Probably in It.



You think discrimination is something obvious.

Something loud.

Something other people do.


It’s not.


Discrimination is quiet. It’s structural. It’s inherited. It’s invisible to the people it benefits and inescapable to the people it harms.





Let’s define it straight:



Discrimination is unequal treatment based on identity, not behavior.

It can be active (“We don’t hire people like you”) or passive (“He just wasn’t a culture fit”).


It shows up in:


  • Hiring. Same resume. Different name. One gets called back. The other doesn’t.
  • Healthcare. Women, Black patients, neurodivergent folks being dismissed or misdiagnosed.
  • Education. Schools in rich white neighborhoods get more funding. Period.
  • Policing. If you think this one needs more examples, open literally any news site.
  • Pay gaps. Race. Gender. Disability. Pick your margin—there’s a gap for it.
  • Media. Whose stories get told? Whose pain gets sympathy? Whose bodies get praised?



Discrimination isn’t a bug in the system. It’s the system functioning exactly as designed.





And if you’re thinking “Well, I’m not racist/sexist/ableist”… cool. But that’s not the point.



The point is: your comfort isn’t proof that things are fair.


We’ve built societies where equality feels like oppression to the privileged.


If you’ve never had to:


  • Code-switch,
  • Translate your grief into something palatable,
  • Worry your name would cost you a job,
  • Tone down your hair, clothes, or voice to feel safe,



…then you’ve experienced protection from discrimination, not absence of it.





So what can we actually do?




1. Acknowledge that you’re biased. Yes, you.



Bias isn’t evil. It’s human.

But unexamined bias becomes policy, culture, and gatekeeping.


Start noticing who gets interrupted. Who gets praised. Who gets promoted. Who gets dismissed.



2. Redistribute the mic.



If you’re in a room and everyone looks, talks, and thinks like you—it’s not diversity. It’s an echo chamber.

Hire different voices. Believe them when they speak. Pay them like it matters.



3. Stop asking marginalized people to fix it.



It is not a Black woman’s job to educate you on racism.

It is not a trans person’s job to explain gender.

It is not a disabled person’s job to make your workplace accessible.


If you caused the mess—or benefit from it—you clean it up.



4. Accept that equity ≠ comfort.



If making things more fair makes you uncomfortable, you were sitting too pretty on the unfair side.


Too many people mistake loss of privilege for oppression. Spoiler: it’s not. It’s balance.





Here’s the gut punch:



Discrimination won’t end because we “raise awareness.”

It’ll end when we change policies, systems, incentives, and power structures.


This is about impact over intention.

Action over optics.

Reparations over apologies.




You want to be a “good person”? Great. Be brave enough to be an uncomfortable one.


Fight discrimination with your choices.

With your hiring. Your platforms. Your money. Your vote.

With your willingness to be wrong and change anyway.


Because silence is comfortable for the privileged.

And deadly for everyone else.


Fact Checking 101

 Fact-checking methodology isn’t about finding any source that agrees with you—it’s about finding the most reliable, transparent, and independently verifiable information available, regardless of whether it supports or challenges your assumptions.


Here’s how to do it right:





Step 1: Identify the Claim Clearly



Break the claim into its core components:


  • What is being stated as fact? (e.g. “Red 40 causes hyperactivity in children.”)
  • Is it a causal claim, a correlation, a policy decision, or just opinion?
  • Is there a specific number or source referenced?






Step 2: Determine the Right Type of Source



Not all sources are created equal. Prioritize these:



Primary Sources (Best)



  • Peer-reviewed scientific studies
  • Government databases (CDC, FDA, NIH, EFSA, EWG, etc.)
  • Court documents or declassified files
  • Official reports from credible institutions




Secondary Sources (Good if they cite primaries)



  • News articles from outlets that cite their sources (e.g., Reuters, AP, Science News)
  • Academic summaries or literature reviews
  • Websites like Snopes or PolitiFact (with caution—verify their citations)




Avoid or Vet Carefully:



  • Random infographics
  • Uncited TikToks, Reels, or screenshots
  • Blogs or subreddits without citations
  • Anything with broken links or unverifiable data






Step 3: Check for Scientific Consensus



  • Does the claim align with the majority of expert opinion?
  • Are there meta-analyses or systematic reviews on the topic?
  • Use databases like:






Step 4: Look for Contradictions and Limitations



  • Are conflicts of interest disclosed?
  • Is the study funded by industry (e.g., Coca-Cola-funded sugar studies)?
  • Is the sample size meaningful? Is it human research or just mouse models?
  • Do other experts critique or confirm the findings?






Step 5: Cross-Check Multiple Sources



  • Don’t rely on one headline or one study.
  • See how the topic is treated by:
    • Public health organizations (e.g., WHO, OEHHA, EWG)
    • Reputable journalism outlets
    • Academic or nonprofit research groups






Step 6: Date Check & Contextualize



  • Is the information recent or outdated?
  • Has the science evolved?
  • Has the policy or regulation changed since publication?






Step 7: Trace the Source of Virality



If the claim comes from a viral post, ask:


  • Where did it originate?
  • Is it citing a study that was misrepresented in the media?
  • Is the stat being quoted out of context or exaggerated?



Example:


“Vaccines reduce heart attacks by 65%” → Was actually a 10–27% reduction, mostly from AstraZeneca in a UK-only study.





Step 8: Ask “Who Benefits?”



Every claim has a context:


  • Is someone selling a product, pushing a political narrative, or defending a system?
  • Who loses if the truth comes out?



This isn’t about paranoia—it’s about recognizing motivated reasoning and institutional incentives.